02/11/2026
Over the past few days we’ve seen a number of questions and concerns about the updated class structure, and we truly appreciate everyone who has taken the time to share their thoughts. This wasn’t a quick or reactionary decision. It reflects several years of discussion, review, and refinement—both here and in conversations with other track operators. We want to offer some additional context to help explain where we’re coming from and how this structure aligns with the progression models used across organized sports.
We appreciate the discussion, and it’s clear everyone here cares about the long‑term health of the program. The structure we’re putting in place isn’t about trophies or limiting anyone—it’s about following the same progression model that every established sport uses to keep competition fair, safe, and enjoyable.
A lot of the feedback we’ve seen centers around concerns about limited track time, class restrictions, and the ability to run multiple vehicles—especially for racers who travel or only get to race a few times a month. We understand that completely. The goal of this structure isn’t to reduce anyone’s racing opportunities. It’s to prevent situations where drivers with very different skill levels end up on the track together, which leads to avoidable contact, frustration, and inconsistent race flow. Week after week, we see developing drivers unintentionally mixing into advanced classes simply because the class list allowed it, not because the skill gap made sense.
That’s why we’re shifting toward grouping racers by experience and consistency rather than just equipment. It’s a system designed to improve the overall quality of racing—not to take entries away.
This approach is actually very normal in organized sports.
- Motorsports: Karting, dirt racing, and full‑scale oval programs all use Rookie, Intermediate, and Pro divisions. Drivers move up when they’re ready—not just because they own the right car.
- Youth and school sports: Athletes don’t jump straight from beginner to varsity. They progress through levels so they can develop without being thrown into a field they aren’t prepared for.
- Martial arts, skiing, and cycling: Skill‑based tiers are the standard because they protect both the developing athlete and the advanced competitor.
- RC off‑road programs: Many tracks already run Sportsman, 17.5, 13.5, and Mod as a progression ladder for the exact same reasons.
We tested this structure at Lakeside last season, and other track operators immediately noticed the improvement in race flow and driver experience. Cleaner racing helps everyone—newer drivers get room to learn, and advanced drivers get the competitive environment they expect.
We also understand that some racers travel and own multiple cars. That’s why we’ve said from the start that there will be flexibility and exceptions once we see how weekly points nights actually shape up. The goal isn’t to force anyone into spending money or abandoning a class they enjoy. It’s to build a sustainable program where drivers compete with others at a similar stage in their development, just like every other sport.
This won’t be perfect on day one, but it’s a step toward a more organized, fair, and enjoyable race night for the majority of racers—and that’s what keeps a program healthy long‑term.