Rink Report

Rink Report Your daily fix of NHL moments, stories, and legends—past and present.

Mike Babcock won a Stanley Cup, two Olympic gold medals, and a Jack Adams Award. He coached the Detroit Red Wings for a ...
06/18/2026

Mike Babcock won a Stanley Cup, two Olympic gold medals, and a Jack Adams Award. He coached the Detroit Red Wings for a decade and kept one of the most consistent winning programs in the league running through roster turnover, salary cap pressure, and aging core players. By pure results he belongs in the conversation with the best coaches in modern NHL history. The controversy that ended his career is real and serious, but it has almost completely erased any honest discussion of what he actually accomplished behind the bench and that erasure is too simple.

The Detroit run alone is enough to cement a serious legacy. From 2005 to 2015 Babcock kept the Red Wings as a playoff team almost every single season. That franchise had Hall of Fame talent but so did plenty of other teams that failed to sustain that level of consistency. Babcock was the constant. He managed egos, managed lines, and managed a locker room full of veterans who had won before and expected to keep winning. That is genuinely hard to do and he did it for ten years.
The Olympic record adds another layer that most NHL coaches never get the opportunity to build. Coaching Canada at the Olympics is one of the highest pressure jobs in hockey and Babcock delivered gold twice in a row. The 2010 tournament on home ice in Vancouver carried enormous national weight and he handled it without flinching. Winning in 2014 in Sochi made it back to back. No other NHL coach has that on his resume.

The controversy that emerged from his Toronto tenure and beyond is not something to dismiss. Multiple players came forward with credible accounts of emotional manipulation and a coaching style that crossed lines. That matters and it is right that it had consequences for his career.

But the hockey world has a habit of going all the way in one direction when a figure falls from grace. Babcock the coach and Babcock the person are two different conversations and right now only one of them is being allowed to happen. His results were real. His methods were deeply problematic. Both things can be true at the same time.

Mike Bossy scored 50 or more goals in nine consecutive seasons. He reached 50 goals faster than anyone in history, hitti...
06/18/2026

Mike Bossy scored 50 or more goals in nine consecutive seasons. He reached 50 goals faster than anyone in history, hitting the mark in just 50 games in 1980-81. He retired with a goals per game ratio of .762, the second highest in NHL history behind only Wayne Gretzky. The man was a pure goal scoring machine in an era that did not protect him, did not spread the ice for him, and actively allowed defenders to hack, hold, and maul him every single night. Put him in today's NHL and he becomes something genuinely frightening.

The modern game was built for a player exactly like Bossy. Obstruction rules eliminated in 2005 opened up the ice in ways that directly benefit finesse players with elite shot release and positioning. The instigator rule protects skill players from the kind of physical punishment Bossy absorbed throughout his career. Bigger ice surfaces in international play showed exactly how dominant pure scorers thrive when given space. Bossy would have had more space, more protection, and better linemates built around his specific skill set under today's systems.

The argument people make against him is that he played on a dynasty with four Stanley Cup teams and Hall of Fame linemates around him. That is true. Bryan Trottier and Clark Gillies made him better. But Bossy made everyone around him better too, and his underlying numbers were so dominant that they hold up regardless of context. Players today with far more offensive support have never come close to his consistency.

The tragedy is that a chronic back injury forced him to retire at 30. He never got to show what a full career looked like. With modern sports medicine, strength and conditioning, and injury management, Bossy almost certainly plays deep into his mid-30s and finishes with numbers that make the conversation even more uncomfortable for people who overlook him.

The counter-argument is that era translation is never perfect and goal scoring totals across all eras have deflated since the 1980s for everyone. But Bossy was not a product of run and gun hockey. He was a product of elite instincts, a release that nobody could track, and positioning that made him open when everyone else was covered. Those skills do not expire.

Ed Belfour won a Calder Trophy, two Vezina Trophies, four Jennings Trophies, an Olympic gold medal, and a Stanley Cup. H...
06/18/2026

Ed Belfour won a Calder Trophy, two Vezina Trophies, four Jennings Trophies, an Olympic gold medal, and a Stanley Cup. He sits fourth all time in wins and second all time in shutouts. By any objective measure, that is a Hall of Fame career that belongs in the conversation with the best to ever do it. And yet when people rattle off the Mount Rushmore of NHL goalies, Belfour's name almost never comes up first. That is a genuine injustice.

The timing hurt him more than anything. Belfour played the peak years of his career in the same era as Patrick Roy and Dominik Hasek, two players who consumed every trophy, every highlight, and every conversation for over a decade. If Belfour plays in any other era he is the undisputed best goalie in the league for a long stretch. Instead he spent his prime finishing second in award voting to legends, which somehow got misread by history as him not being elite.

His 1999 Stanley Cup run with Dallas is one of the most overlooked championship performances of the modern era. The Stars were a defensive team built around him and he delivered when it mattered most. That team does not win without Belfour standing on his head in close games throughout that playoff run.

The knock on him was always his personality. He was difficult, intense, and famously combustible. But nobody penalizes Roy for flipping out at the Montreal bench or Hasek for his contract disputes. Belfour's reputation as a headcase followed him unfairly and colored how people remembered his actual play.

The counter-argument is that two Vezinas is still a strong haul and voters at the time were not wrong to recognize Hasek and Roy as the top tier. But being the third best goalie of the greatest goaltending era in NHL history and finishing with those career numbers still deserves a lot more respect than Belfour gets today.

When people talk about goalies who used their sticks as weapons, who protected their crease with a physical menace that ...
06/17/2026

When people talk about goalies who used their sticks as weapons, who protected their crease with a physical menace that made forwards think twice before parking in front of the net, the conversation almost always starts with Ron Hextall. And Hextall deserves that recognition completely. But there is a goalie who came before him who established the entire blueprint, who showed the NHL that a goalie could be the most dangerous player on the ice without ever facing a single shot, and whose influence on Hextall and every other physically intimidating goalie who followed is almost never properly acknowledged. His name was Billy Smith and he was doing everything Hextall became famous for a full decade earlier.

Smith played for the New York Islanders through their dynasty years in the early 1980s and won four consecutive Stanley Cups from 1980 to 1983. He was a legitimate elite goalie who anchored one of the greatest dynasties the sport has ever produced. But the thing that made him genuinely unique and genuinely feared had nothing to do with his save percentage. It was the stick. Smith treated his goal stick as an extension of his authority over the crease and he used it on any opposing player who came within range with a consistency and a lack of remorse that was almost breathtaking to watch.

He earned the nickname Battling Billy and then later Billy the Kid not because of anything romantic or exciting but because of a simple and brutal truth. He would slash you. He would do it without hesitation, without warning, and without any particular concern about whether the referee was watching. He slashed ankles, legs, hands, and whatever else came within range when an opposing forward decided the front of the net was a comfortable place to set up shop. The message was delivered clearly and repeatedly and most forwards eventually received it and adjusted their behavior accordingly.

The official credit for the first goal scored by a goalie in NHL history belongs to Smith even though the circumstances were unusual. In 1979 he was the last Islander to touch the puck before it went into his own net off a Colorado Rockies player and he was officially credited with the goal. Hextall gets the credit for the first goalie to actually shoot the puck into the opposing net but Smith has the record and he would absolutely remind you of that if given the opportunity.

What Smith established that Hextall later perfected was the idea that a goalie's value to his team extended beyond stopping pucks. A goalie who controlled the crease physically, who made forwards pay a consistent price for entry, who was genuinely unpredictable in a way that created hesitation in the most dangerous scoring areas on the ice, was contributing to team defense in ways that the statistics of the era had no language to describe.

Hextall watched what Smith built in New York and understood it completely. The slash on Kent Nilsson in 1987 did not come from nowhere. It came from a tradition that Billy Smith established in Nassau Coliseum years earlier and nobody in the hockey world ever gave him the founding credit he deserved.

Every goalie in NHL history has been judged by what happens when the puck comes toward them. Save percentage. Goals agai...
06/17/2026

Every goalie in NHL history has been judged by what happens when the puck comes toward them. Save percentage. Goals against average. How they perform under pressure when the best shooters in the world are bearing down on them with everything on the line. Ron Hextall was judged by all of those things and performed well enough to win a Conn Smythe Trophy and establish himself as one of the best goalies of his generation. But what separated him from every other goalie who ever put on pads was what happened when the puck was nowhere near him. Opposing players did not just worry about scoring on Ron Hextall. They worried about what Ron Hextall was going to do to them.

This was not an accident. It was a deliberate and calculated approach to the position that Hextall understood better than anyone. A goalie who makes opposing players think twice before going to the front of the net, who makes forwards hesitate before crashing the crease, who makes defensemen aware that their goalie is not a passive presence waiting to be tested but an active and genuinely dangerous participant in every physical confrontation near his net, is a goalie who changes the geometry of the entire game in ways that save percentage cannot measure.

The slash on Kent Nilsson in the 1987 Stanley Cup Finals is the moment that announced what Hextall was to the entire league. He skated out from his crease and slashed Nilsson across the back of the legs with a swing that had nothing subtle about it. He received a suspension. He served it without apology. And every forward in the NHL updated their mental file on Ron Hextall to include a warning they had never had to carry about a goalie before. The crease was his territory and entering it without consequences was no longer guaranteed.

The fight against Chris Chelios the following season removed any remaining doubt. A goalie dropping his stick and going after one of the most feared defensemen in the league is not something that happens in professional hockey. It happened with Hextall because Hextall operated by a completely different set of rules than every other person who ever played his position. He was not protecting a zone. He was protecting a principle. Nobody was going to take liberties in his crease and walk away feeling comfortable about it.

The Broad Street Bullies gave him the perfect environment to be exactly what he was. Philadelphia celebrated physical intimidation as a hockey philosophy and Hextall fit that culture so completely that he almost seemed designed for it. The Spectrum crowd did not just cheer his saves. They cheered the moments when he reminded everyone on the ice that the most dangerous thing happening in that building was standing in the blue paint wearing number 27.

No goalie in the history of the sport made opposing players think about anything other than scoring as much as Ron Hextall did. That is not a footnote to his legacy. That is the whole story.

There have been tougher fighters in NHL history. There have been more physically imposing enforcers who won more fights ...
06/17/2026

There have been tougher fighters in NHL history. There have been more physically imposing enforcers who won more fights and inflicted more damage on a nightly basis. But there has never been an enforcer in the history of the sport who connected with a fanbase the way Tie Domi connected with Toronto and there has never been a city that understood what it had the way Toronto understood what it had in him.

Domi stood five foot ten and weighed around 213 pounds which made him undersized by enforcer standards in an era when the position was dominated by players significantly larger than him. He compensated with ferocity, with willingness, and with a fearlessness that made size irrelevant in a way that pure toughness rarely manages. He did not pick opponents based on matchups or avoid the biggest fighters in the league. He fought everybody. He fought them when they were bigger. He fought them when they were angrier. He fought them when the outcome was uncertain and sometimes when it was not in his favor and he showed up the next game and did it again.

The Air Canada Centre relationship between Domi and the Toronto crowd was something that does not have a clean equivalent anywhere else in professional sports. He was not a star in the traditional sense. He did not score goals that won games or set up plays that changed series. He protected teammates, he changed momentum with his fists, and he made the building feel different when he was on the ice in a way that only the most charismatic players in the sport can manufacture. Toronto fans did not just appreciate him. They adored him with a completeness that most skilled players never experience from their own crowd.

The longevity tells the real story. Sixteen seasons in the NHL. 3515 penalty minutes, third most in the history of the sport behind Dave Williams and Dale Hunter. He was not a young man's game player who faded out when the physicality caught up with him. He was a professional whose specific skills aged differently than scoring ability does and he delivered those skills consistently across nearly two decades at the highest level of the game.

His willingness to stand up for teammates regardless of the consequences is what defined his reputation inside the dressing room and in the stands. Multiple times throughout his career he put himself in situations that cost him suspensions and games specifically because a teammate needed protecting. Toronto fans understood exactly why he did it every single time and the response was never criticism. It was gratitude. The city saw a player who prioritized the people around him over his own interests and connected with that quality in a way that transcended anything that shows up in a box score.

Tie Domi was never going to win a Norris Trophy or a Hart Trophy or score the goal that wins the Stanley Cup. But in sixteen years of professional hockey he earned something that most players with all those trophies never get. He earned a city. Toronto was his and he was Toronto's and the hockey world outside that building took far too long to understand what that actually meant.

Four Stanley Cups. Four. With four different core rosters across three different franchises over fifteen years. That num...
06/17/2026

Four Stanley Cups. Four. With four different core rosters across three different franchises over fifteen years. That number alone should make Claude Lemieux one of the most celebrated players in the history of the sport. Instead he is remembered primarily as the player everyone wanted to fight and the guy who did the things that made opponents lose their composure at the worst possible moments. And here is the part nobody wants to admit. Those two things are not contradictions. They are the same achievement described from two different angles.

Lemieux understood something about playoff hockey that most players never fully grasp. The Stanley Cup playoffs are not just a physical competition. They are a psychological one. The team that stays composed under pressure, that does not let emotion override ex*****on, that keeps playing the game instead of reacting to what is happening around them wins more often than the most talented team in the building. Lemieux made his entire career out of destroying that composure in the best players on the opposing team and doing it at the moments when composure mattered most.

The Kris Draper hit in the 1996 Western Conference Finals is the moment that defined his legacy and haunted him for the rest of his career. It was a dirty hit. It broke Draper's face in multiple places and it crossed a line that most players recognized immediately. The Detroit Red Wings did not forget it for years. The rivalry it created between Colorado and Detroit became one of the most intense and genuinely violent in the history of the sport. And Lemieux was at the center of all of it, the lightning rod around which everything else organized itself.

What gets lost in the Draper conversation is what Lemieux did in those same 1996 playoffs before and after that moment. He won the Conn Smythe Trophy as the most valuable player of the entire postseason. The player the entire hockey world was screaming about for a dirty hit was simultaneously the best player in the playoffs by the judgment of the people who covered the sport every single day. Both things were true at the same time and the hockey world has never quite known how to hold them together.

The four championships across four different team situations is the evidence that closes the argument about his value. New Jersey in 1995 and 2000. Colorado in 1996. Anaheim in 2003. Each time a different roster, a different supporting cast, a different system and coach and set of expectations. Each time Lemieux showed up and delivered in the biggest moments of the biggest games and got under the skin of every opponent who tried to stop him. That is not luck. That is a specific and devastating skill applied consistently across the longest and most grueling competition in professional sports.

The hockey world hated Claude Lemieux for what he did on the ice. The championship banners hanging in three different arenas explain exactly why his teams kept asking him to do it anyway.

Nobody in the history of the NHL made opposing players lose their minds more consistently and more completely than Sean ...
06/16/2026

Nobody in the history of the NHL made opposing players lose their minds more consistently and more completely than Sean Avery. That is not an insult. That is a job description and a performance review at the same time. Avery was hired to get under people's skin, disrupt the emotional composure of the best players in the world, and make the other team think about him instead of the game. He did it better than anyone who ever played and the hockey world hated him for being too good at something it did not want to acknowledge as a legitimate skill.

The hate was not manufactured. An NHLPA poll of active players once voted Avery the most hated player in the entire league by a margin that was not close. His own peers, the people who understood the game better than anyone, despised him collectively and openly. That level of universal hatred from professional athletes is almost impossible to achieve and Avery managed it consistently for years. Whether you think that is admirable or disgusting depends entirely on how you feel about the role he was playing.

The role of agitator in professional hockey is real and it has value. Every coach who has ever won a championship understands this. You need players who can change the emotional temperature of a game, who can provoke a reaction from a star player that takes him out of his game for a shift or a period or sometimes an entire game. Avery did not just do this occasionally. He did it systematically, deliberately, and with a creativity that separated him from every other pest the sport has ever produced.

The Brodeur screen in the 2008 playoffs is the moment everyone remembers and the moment that changed the rules. Avery standing in front of Martin Brodeur waving his arms to distract the goalie was immediately legislated out of existence with a rule change that became known informally as the Sean Avery rule. Think about that for a moment. The NHL changed its rulebook specifically because of something one player did. That does not happen to irrelevant people. That happens to players who found an advantage so effective that the league had no choice but to eliminate it.

The off ice personality made him an easy target. He was loud, he was provocative, he said things that made the hockey establishment deeply uncomfortable, and he did not particularly care who knew it. The comments about Dion Phaneuf's girlfriend that got him suspended in 2008 were indefensible and he deserved that suspension completely. But the hockey world used that moment to retroactively dismiss everything he did on the ice as the behavior of a bad person rather than evaluating his on ice contributions on their own merits.

His relationship with coaches was genuinely difficult and it is worth being honest about that. He was benched, scratched, and eventually bought out by the Rangers before his career ended. He was not an easy player to manage and several coaches found him more trouble than he was worth. But the teams that used him correctly, that understood what they were getting and deployed him with a purpose, got real value from a player who absorbed attention, provoked reactions, and created space and opportunities for teammates by making himself the most hated person in the building every single night.

Sean Avery was not a good person by every measure and he would probably not argue otherwise. But he was extraordinary at a specific and legitimate hockey role and the sport's refusal to acknowledge that is just the hockey establishment being too proud to admit that the player it hated most was also one of the most effective at what he was asked to do.

Joe Sakic won the Hart Trophy. He won the Conn Smythe. He won two Stanley Cups. He represented Canada in multiple Olympi...
06/16/2026

Joe Sakic won the Hart Trophy. He won the Conn Smythe. He won two Stanley Cups. He represented Canada in multiple Olympics and World Championships and delivered every single time. He scored 625 goals and 1641 points in a career that spanned two decades and produced some of the most clutch performances the sport has ever seen. And somehow, impossibly, he was underappreciated for most of it while it was actually happening.

The problem with Joe Sakic was that he made everything look too easy. He did not have Lemieux's physical poetry or Gretzky's supernatural playmaking or Forsberg's chaotic brilliance. He just scored. He just won. He just delivered in the biggest moments with a calm so complete that it registered as routine rather than remarkable. His wrist shot was the cleanest in the sport and he released it so quickly that goalies often did not see it until it was behind them. But clean and quick does not make highlight reels the way Ovechkin's one timer does.

The Colorado situation buried him further. He spent his entire career in Denver, a market that loved him genuinely and deeply but carried almost no national weight in the hockey conversation. He was not in Toronto or Montreal or New York where the media amplifies everything. He was in Colorado doing historic things in front of audiences that the broader hockey world was not paying close enough attention to.
The 1996 playoffs are the clearest example of how badly the sport undersold him in real time. He scored 18 goals in 22 playoff games. Eighteen goals. In a single postseason. A number that belongs in the conversation about the greatest individual playoff performances in NHL history and gets mentioned occasionally as a footnote rather than the landmark achievement it actually was. He won the Conn Smythe that year and it felt like the hockey world nodded politely and moved on.

The 2002 Olympics gave him the biggest stage he ever had and he delivered the most iconic moment of his career. The gold medal goal against the United States. A wrist shot so perfect and so timely that it gave Canada its first Olympic gold in fifty years. That moment was celebrated enormously in the immediate aftermath and then quietly filed away while Gretzky got credited for assembling the team and Lemieux got credited for returning from retirement to play on it.

Sakic scored the goal. Sakic always scored the goal. The hockey world just kept finding reasons to talk about someone else while he was doing it.

06/16/2026

Hockey twins who are chasing the exact same dream

Address

Boston, MA

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Rink Report posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share