Hola Boys

Hola Boys Yesterday won't be over until tomorrow and tomorrow began ten thousand years ago. William Faulkner.

In third century Rome, the emperor Claudius Gothicus ordered the arrest of a Christian priest. While in custody the prie...
24/02/2026

In third century Rome, the emperor Claudius Gothicus ordered the arrest of a Christian priest. While in custody the priest is said to have healed the blind daughter of his jailer, resulting in the jailer and his entire family converting to Christianity and being baptized. When Gothicus learned what had happened he was furious and by his command the priest was beaten, stoned, then beheaded. Christians built a chapel over the martyred priest’s grave, and in due course he was canonized. Father Valentinus thus became Saint Valentinus.

Eleven centuries later, legend had it that St. Valentine had been arrested for secretly officiating the marriages of Christian couples after Gothicus had banned weddings (on the grounds that married men didn’t make good soldiers), a claim that, although not included in the earliest accounts, may (or may not) have been true.

According to English folk tradition birds chose their mates for the upcoming season on February 14, the feast day of Saint Valentine. Perhaps inspired by a 14th century Geoffrey Chaucer poem mentioning this tradition, lovestruck upper-class English men and women began sending love notes to their sweethearts (who they referred to as their “Valentines”) on St. Valentine’s day. And the rest is history.

Father (soon to be Saint) Valentinus was martyred on February 14, 269, one thousand seven hundred fifty-seven years ago today.

The image of St. Valentine is from a 15th century German painting that is part of the permanent collection at the North Carolina Museum of Art in Raleigh.

Prior to the 1850s, it was very unusual for men in Great Britain or the United States to wear facial hair. But by the se...
24/02/2026

Prior to the 1850s, it was very unusual for men in Great Britain or the United States to wear facial hair. But by the second half of the century, fashionable men were sporting copious and often outrageous beards. When and how did the change in fashion occur?

Some British officers stationed abroad in the vast empire began to imitate Continental European officers, for whom mustaches were fashionable. Indeed, on the continent having a mustache tended to indicate that the mustachioed man was in the military, which is why pacifist anabaptist men wore (and continue to wear) beards without mustaches. But in the British army, with few exceptions, full beards were banned.

That regulation changed out of necessity during the Crimean War. Because of a shortage of shaving soap, and to protect the soldiers’ faces from the extreme cold temperatures, the men were allowed and encouraged to grow beards. When the bearded soldiers returned to heroes’ welcomes in Great Britain, Queen Victoria remarked that the men’s beards made them “the picture of real fighting men.” Suddenly beards were associated not with slovenliness or insanity, but with courage and manliness, and they began to sprout on the faces of civilians and soldiers alike. Magazines and newspapers carried the new style across the ocean, and it soon swept the male population of the United States as well.

In 1860 the British army enacted regulations preventing soldiers from shaving above their lips, essentially mandating mustaches for men who could grow them. In time beards were again prohibited, but the military mustaches remained, with regiments often adopting mustache styles unique to their regiment.

It all ended, however, during World War I with the advent of chemical warfare. The necessity of wearing gas masks, and the fact that the masks would not seal on bearded or mustachioed faces, caused the enactment of regulations requiring that soldiers be cleanshaven.

In March 2024 the British army eliminated its ban on beards and British soldiers (like British airmen and sailors) may now once again grow beards, although beard length is limited to about 1 inch (25.5 mm). Beards have always been allowed in the U.S. military only with a medical or religious exemption.

The photo is of three men of the 72nd Regiment of Foot (Highlanders), taken in 1856.

Thomas Jefferson and John Marshall were cousins, but they deeply disliked each other, their longstanding personal differ...
24/02/2026

Thomas Jefferson and John Marshall were cousins, but they deeply disliked each other, their longstanding personal differences becoming even more bitter as the men increasingly became political and philosophical rivals.

Marshall was an ardent Federalist, supporting a powerful central government. Jefferson was the founder of the party that opposed the Federalists, advocating a decentralized and weak federal government. In the tumultuous election of 1800, Jefferson was elected president, defeating Federalist John Adams, and Jefferson’s party won control of Congress. But in the closing days of his presidency, Adams and the lame duck Federalist-controlled Congress rushed through appointments to the federal judiciary, filling the federal courts with Federalists and appointing John Marshall as chief justice of the Supreme Court—actions which incensed Jefferson and contributed to he and Adams breaking off all relations and correspondence for over 12 years.

Three years after his appointment, in 1803, Marshall wrote the opinion in Marbury v. Madison, establishing the concept of judicial review—the principle that the Supreme Court has the authority to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. The Marbury decision infuriated Jefferson, who decried the federal judiciary as unelected elites and adamantly denied that the Supreme Court had the final and exclusive say on constitutionality, insisting that the president, Congress, and even state legislatures had the power to declare a federal law unconstitutional. In a letter to Abigail Adams a year after the opinion was handed down, Jefferson wrote, “The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional, and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislature and executive also, in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch.” On the question of “whether judges are invested with exclusive authority to decide on the constitutionality of a law,” Jefferson later wrote, “there is not a word in the constitution which has given that power to them more than to the Executive or Legislative branches.” Making judges the ultimate arbiters of constitutionality, he wrote subsequently, is “a very dangerous doctrine indeed and one which would place us under the despotism of an Oligarchy.” Jefferson argued that whereas Congress and the president are directly answerable to the people and can be voted out of office if they behave unconstitutionally, unelected federal judges with lifetime tenure are exempt from that check. “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves.”

Marshall dismissed Jefferson’s arguments, claiming they derived from ambition and a lust for power. “For Mr. Jefferson’s opinion as respects this department, it is not difficult to assign the cause,” Marshall wrote. “He is among the most ambitious, and I suspect among the most unforgiving of men. His great power is over the mass of people, and this power is chiefly acquired by professions of democracy. Every check on the wild impulse of the moment is a check on his own power, and he is unfriendly to the source from which it flows. He looks of course with ill will at an independent judiciary.”

Of course, Marshall’s doctrine of judicial review has carried the day, and is now a firmly established component of the American system of government.

After 34 years on the bench, Marshall passed away in July 1835. He is still the longest serving (and most influential) chief justice in American history. Jefferson died nine years earlier. Although he and Adams had reconciled in 1812 and resumed their correspondence and friendship, Jefferson and Marshall never reconciled, and Jefferson never conceded the legitimacy of Marshall’s establishment of judicial review.

Soon after inheriting Mount Vernon, John Augustine Washington III came to realize that the estate could not be profitabl...
24/02/2026

Soon after inheriting Mount Vernon, John Augustine Washington III came to realize that the estate could not be profitably operated and maintained. Of course even then it was a popular tourist destination, but in those days the tourists were uninvited intruders who made managing the farm and home even more difficult. So, reluctantly, he offered to sell the property to the state of Virginia or to the federal government.

Virginia passed, being unable to afford it. Likewise Congress refused the offer, the proposed sale blocked by Congressmen who did not believe preservation of historic properties was a proper function of the federal government. The once magnificent home of John’s famous great-granduncle George was beginning to deteriorate. The future of Mount Vernon was in great doubt.

Louisa Bird Cunningham saw Mount Vernon while traveling down the Potomac by steamboat in 1853. Saddened by the sight of the dilapidated home, she wrote her daughter Ann Pamela Cunningham, “I was painfully distressed at the ruin and desolation of the home of Washington and the thought passed through my mind: Why was it that the women of his country did not try to keep it in repair, if the men could not do it? It does seem such a blot on our country!” Galvanized into action by her mother’s letter, Cunningham sprang into action.

In 1853, Cunningham founded the Mount Vernon Ladies Association, the first historic preservation association in the country, and began raising the funds to acquire and restore the estate. Initially John Washington was not receptive to the notion of selling to the Association, continuing to insist instead that Mount Vernon should be a government-owned property. But with the success of Cunningham’s efforts and with the encouragement of the state of Virginia, in 1858 he agreed to the sale. On February 22, 1860, one hundred sixty-six years ago today, the final payment was made, and the Mount Vernon Ladies Association took possession of the property.

The oldest women’s patriotic society in the United States, the Mount Vernon Ladies Association still owns and operates Mount Vernon. It is the most popular historic estate in the United States, hosting about one million visitors per year.

On his 33rd birthday, February 11, 1781, Colonel Edward Carrington was busy performing the greatest service he made in t...
24/02/2026

On his 33rd birthday, February 11, 1781, Colonel Edward Carrington was busy performing the greatest service he made in the cause of American independence—a service that may have determined the outcome of the war.

A lawyer from Virginia, Carrington had embraced the Patriot cause from the earliest days of the revolution, serving as an artillery officer in the Continental Army for the first five years of the war.

When Nathanael Greene took command of the southern American army in late 1780, he appointed Carrington as the army’s quartermaster general. It was likely not an assignment that Carrington found desirable. As Greene himself had protested when George Washington appointed him quartermaster of the army, “Nobody ever heard of a quartermaster in history.” But Washington knew how crucial the job was and he knew that Greene was the right man for it. And of course history now remembers that Greene’s brilliance in the role helped keep the American army alive, clothed, and fed during the some of the revolution’s darkest days. So General Greene knew as well as anyone how vitally important Carrington’s job would be. He had come to be impressed by the colonel’s diligence and attention to detail and he entrusted him with a mission that would eventually save the American army from destruction and help turn the tide of the war.

From the time he took command of the army, Greene planned carefully for all contingencies. Unlike his predecessor Horatio Gates, who hadn’t even planned for what to do in case he lost the next battle, Greene looked distantly into the future, like a master chess player. He instructed Carrington to scout the rivers of North Carolina and southern Virginia, to determine crossing points should retreats become necessary. Most importantly in light of future events, he instructed Carrington to make plans for how the American army could cross the Dan River, should that become necessary, and assuming the British to be in hot pursuit.

Those plans came to fruition in February 1781. On February 9 in Guilford County, North Carolina, Greene and his senior officers decided the American army was too weak to give battle to Cornwallis. Instead, they decided to retreat into Virginia, where the army could be rested, reprovisioned, and reinforced. But how to make it to and across the river with the British army in pursuit? Thanks to the work of Edward Carrington, Greene had a plan that might trick the Cornwallis long enough to allow them to pull it off.

From his scouting efforts Carrington had learned that only the westerly “upper” fords on the Dan River were fordable at that time of year, the “lower” fords being too deep to wade across. Any crossing at the lower fords would require boats. Of course, the British knew this too. They also thought they knew that there weren’t enough boats on the river to carry the army across quickly. What they didn’t know was that Carrington had for months been secretly gathering all the boats along the Dan River, keeping them carefully hidden from Tory spies. Carrington recommended that Greene march the army to the lower fords, where it could be ferried across the river on his makeshift flotilla.

To deceive the British, Greene sent 700 men under the command of Colonel Otho Holland Williams on a march toward the upper fords, decoying the British into thinking they were the entire American army, marching toward the only usable crossing points on the river. Cornwallis took the bait, and Williams led him to the north and west, while General Greene and the bulk of the army marched north and east, toward the lower fords, where Carrington’s boats were waiting.

By the time Cornwallis figured out that he was being duped, Greene and his army had made it safety. Williams then turned his light corps and dashed for the crossings, with Cornwallis nipping at this tail the entire way. It was a grueling and precarious race, but Williams made it across the river on Carrington’s boats, crossing on February 14, just ahead of his British pursuers. When the British arrived at the southern bank of the river, all they could do was look across in frustration at the boats tied to the opposite shore, and at the sentries jeering back at them. The Americans had won the Race to the Dan.

Acclaimed and praised for his success, Carrington went on to serve as Greene’s quartermaster general for the rest of the war. After the war he served as a delegate to the Continental Congress and in 1807 he was the foreman of the jury that heard Aaron Burr’s treason trial.

At age 27, Edward Carrington had been in the crowd standing outside the windows of St. John’s Church in Richmond as the Second Virginia Convention met inside. There he listened as Patrick Henry delivered his famous “Liberty or Death” speech. After Henry’s dramatic conclusion, Carrington turned to his friends and said, “Boys, I want to be buried here! On this very spot!” Carrington died in October 1810 at age 62. He is buried on the very spot where he was standing when he heard Patrick Henry’s speech.

Edward Carrington was born on February 11, 1748, two hundred seventy-eight years ago today.

On this day in 1861, Jefferson Davis was inaugurated as the first (and only) president of the Confederate States of Amer...
22/02/2026

On this day in 1861, Jefferson Davis was inaugurated as the first (and only) president of the Confederate States of America. Two weeks later Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated as president of the United States of America.

Throughout America and around the world, observers in 1861 were comparing the credentials of the two competing presidents. Both had been born in Kentucky, about 100 miles and 8 months apart. But that is where the similarities end. Davis was a graduate of West Point, a hero of the Mexican War, a long-serving influential U.S. Senator, and one of the most acclaimed and successful Secretaries of War. Lincoln, on the other hand, had served only one two-year term in Congress, 12 years earlier. He had no higher education or military experience of any consequence, and had no experience in a position of executive authority.

But while Davis may have had the stronger resume in 1861, it was Lincoln who would earn the favor of history. Davis is generally regarded as having been an ineffective president, while Lincoln is generally considered to have been the greatest president in American history.

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni died in Rome on this day in 1564, at age 88. Admired for his artistic brillia...
22/02/2026

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni died in Rome on this day in 1564, at age 88. Admired for his artistic brilliance, he was often called by his contemporaries “Il Divino” (“the divine one”). History remembers him as simply “Michelangelo.”

Michelangelo might have been forgotten by history had his father had his way. Lodovico di Leonardo Buonarroti Simoni came from a long line of bankers, and he sent his son to a school in Florence, intending for him to pursue a career in business. But fortunately for Western civilization, Michelangelo had no interest in school, spending his time instead observing and copying sculpture and paintings. He would later joke that he had imbibed a passion for sculpting while nursing. His mother was in poor health after Michelangelo’s birth (she died when he was six) and he was sent to live with a nanny/wetnurse who lived beside a quarry by the wife of a stonecutter. “I took the hammer and chisels with which I carve my figures from my wet-nurse’s milk,” he would later say. In any event, Michelangelo’s deficiencies as a student, and his immense promise as an artist, were soon recognized and at age 13 he was apprenticed to a prominent Florentine artist.

During his long and prolific career Michelangelo produced some of history’s best-loved and most influential works of art. He expressed his genius in sculpture (he created his masterpieces “Pieta” and “David” before age 30), in painting (his fresco on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is one of the most admired works in history), and in architecture (beginning at age 72 he oversaw the completion of St. Peter’s Basilica). He was quite simply one of the greatest artists who ever lived.

The historian Benedetto Varchi delivered Michelangelo’s funeral oration. He described the effect of seeing Michelangelo’s work with words that four centuries of admirers would endorse: “I am not only full of admiration, not only amazed, not only astonished and startled and one reborn—but my pulse flutters, my blood runs cold, my mind reels, and my hair stands on end, so moved am I.”

The portrait, which now hangs in the Met in New York City, is believed to have been made when Michelangelo was about age 70 and is attributed to Daniele da Volterra.

“The sculpture is already complete within the marble block, before I start my work. It is already there. I just have to chisel away the superfluous material.”

#

Address

Delhi
11201

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Hola Boys posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share