07/05/2026
When does q***r art stop being q***r?
Not when it’s censored. Not when it’s attacked.
But when it is welcomed, funded, programmed.
What I observe (in Hungary, but not only): when institutions include, they also translate. Into curatorial frameworks, funding logics, audience expectations, market circulation... And translation is never neutral.
What was once illegible, excessive, relational, unstable, becomes readable, presentable, collectible.
Queerness shifts from a lived condition to an aesthetic regime.
From friction to to form. From risk to style.
At some point, it no longer needs to be q***r.
It only needs to look like it.
From here my question:
Is inclusion always a victory?
Or can it also be a form of capture?
--
Full text unpacking all this (canonization, aestheticization, institutional logic, and what it might mean to refuse inclusion as a horizon...).
Link in the first comment ↓