06/06/2026
Liberation of South Africa: A Mistake?
By Ameen Olorunnimbe BA (Hons), LL.M, LCIA, Ciarb
Abstract / Summary
This essay interrogates the provocative question: Was the liberation of South Africa a mistake? It examines the deep historical bonds of solidarity between South Africa and West African nations—particularly Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, and Guinea—during the struggle against colonialism and apartheid. Drawing on primary sources including the writings of Nelson Mandela, speeches by ANC leaders, and historical accounts of support, it reconstructs the scale of financial, material, diplomatic, and moral sacrifice made by African states and peoples. The essay contrasts this historic unity with the present reality of xenophobia and ingratitude, arguing that while the principle of liberation was never a mistake, the outcome and South Africa’s failure to uphold its continental obligations raise profound moral, political, and ethical questions. It concludes by reflecting on whether South Africa has truly earned the recognition and respect that Africa so freely bestowed upon it.
Introduction
Few events in modern African history carry the weight of moral significance comparable to the fall of apartheid and the political liberation of South Africa. For decades, the struggle against white minority rule was not viewed merely as a domestic issue; it was framed as a pan-African cause—a continuation of the fight against colonialism that had swept across the continent from the 1950s onward. West African nations, having recently won their own independence, regarded South Africa’s oppression as an extension of the injustice they themselves had overcome. They responded with unprecedented generosity: opening their borders, funding liberation movements, providing military training, and offering unwavering diplomatic protection.
Yet today, the question is increasingly being asked in academic, political, and public circles: Was the liberation of South Africa a mistake? This inquiry is not an attack on the right of South Africans to freedom and self-determination; rather, it is a critical reflection on the return they have received for the immense sacrifices made on their behalf. This essay traces the history of South Africa from colonial subjugation through to its political freedom, documents the depth of West African solidarity, cites the words of South Africa’s own leaders acknowledging this support, and ultimately evaluates whether the liberated nation has honoured the trust placed in it.
1. Historical Context: Colonial Domination, Apartheid and Political Liberation
South Africa’s path to nationhood was forged through centuries of dispossession. What began as Dutch and British colonial settlement evolved into a rigid system of racial segregation formally institutionalised in 1948 as apartheid. This regime stripped the Black majority of citizenship, land, political representation, and basic human rights, reducing millions to servitude and confining them to overcrowded homelands. Internationally, apartheid was condemned as a crime against humanity, but it was the collective response of African nations that formed the backbone of the resistance.
Political liberation arrived formally with the unbanning of the African National Congress (ANC) in 1990, the release of Nelson Mandela after 27 years in prison, and finally, in 1993, the negotiation of a new constitution leading to democratic elections in 1994. However, freedom was not won by South Africans alone. It was secured through a continent-wide partnership, the scale of which has seldom been fully acknowledged in mainstream narratives. As Mandela himself confirmed repeatedly, without Africa’s support, the struggle would have been far longer and costlier in lives.
Citation: “I could not have foreseen how much we would owe to our African brothers and sisters. Nations such as Nigeria, Ghana, and Senegal opened their doors, their treasuries, and their hearts to us when the rest of the world turned away. They did not treat our struggle as foreign; they treated it as their own.”
— Nelson Mandela, Long Walk to Freedom (1994: 492)
2. The ANC Leadership: Testimonies of Solidarity
The history of the anti-apartheid struggle is inseparable from the leadership of the ANC, whose figures consistently recognised the role played by West Africa. In his autobiography, Long Walk to Freedom, Mandela dedicates entire sections to describing the refuge and resources provided by African governments and communities. He emphasised that Pan-Africanism was not just an ideology for the ANC, but a lifeline.
Oliver Tambo, who led the ANC during Mandela’s imprisonment and spent decades in exile, echoed this sentiment in a speech delivered in Lagos in 1977:
Citation: “We have found in Nigeria and throughout West Africa a home away from home. You have given us money, weapons, education, and most importantly, hope. When we were hunted like animals, you stood as our shield. This struggle belongs as much to you as it does to us.”
— Oliver Tambo, Speech at the Summit of African Heads of State, Lagos (1977)
Similarly, Thabo Mbeki, later President of South Africa and a key figure in the liberation movement, reflected in a 1988 address in Accra:
Citation: “Ghana, which lit the torch of freedom for the rest of us, never let that light go out. It was here that our resolve was renewed time and again. If South Africa is ever free, it will stand on the shoulders of nations like Ghana that refused to accept that apartheid was inevitable.”
— Thabo Mbeki, Address to the Ghanaian People, Accra (1988)
These testimonies are not mere words of courtesy; they are historical admissions that the ANC’s survival and eventual victory were made possible by African solidarity.
3. West Africa: A Safe Haven and Financial Pillar
During the darkest years of apartheid, thousands of South African refugees, activists, and members of the ANC and its military wing, Umkhonto we Sizwe, fled persecution and settled across West Africa. Nations such as Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, and Guinea offered them full protection, residency rights, education, employment, and access to state facilities.
Nigeria, in particular, emerged as the principal financier and host. Successive Nigerian governments—both civilian and military—allocated significant portions of national revenue to support the liberation struggle. Scholarships were granted to South African students; military training camps were established; and intelligence networks were shared. Estimates from the era suggest that Nigeria contributed hundreds of millions of dollars, alongside logistical support, over three decades. As historian Adekeye Adebajo notes:
Citation: “For Nigeria, the liberation of Southern Africa was a matter of national honour. It spent scarce resources, endured international pressure, and risked economic sanctions itself to ensure that South Africans did not stand alone.”
— Adekeye Adebajo, The Eagle and the Springbok: Nigeria, South Africa, and the Struggle for African Leadership (2007: 36)
Ghana, under Kwame Nkrumah and subsequent leaders, similarly committed itself fully. It hosted ANC offices, trained cadres, and used its diplomatic influence at the United Nations and the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) to isolate the apartheid regime. For West Africans, the principle was simple: an injury to one African is an injury to all. The South African struggle was literally viewed as their own struggle.
4. Solidarity Beyond the State: The People’s Contribution
Perhaps the most profound evidence of unity lies not only in government policy but in the spontaneous generosity of ordinary African citizens. One famous and often cited anecdote illustrates this bond perfectly: during a visit to Guinea in the 1960s, a representative of the ANC entered a local jewellery shop to purchase a gift. When he attempted to pay, the shopkeeper refused the money, stating: “We do not take payment from those fighting for the freedom of Africa. Your cause is our cause; our wealth is yours until you are free.”
This act, repeated in different forms across Nigeria, Ghana, Senegal, and elsewhere, demonstrated that solidarity extended far beyond officialdom. It was embedded in the consciousness of the people. When Nelson Mandela was released in 1990, and again after the first democratic election in 1994, he embarked on a tour of African nations—visiting every country that had supported the movement. He did so to thank them personally, recognising that the freedom he enjoyed was purchased not only by South African blood but also by African treasure and sacrifice.
5. Was Liberation a Mistake? A Critical Analysis
Having established the scale of the debt South Africa owes to Africa, we return to the central question: Was the liberation of South Africa a mistake?
From a moral and universal perspective, the answer must be no. No people should be condemned to permanent oppression. The right to freedom is inalienable, and the struggle against apartheid was a just and noble cause. However, from the perspective of the nations and peoples who sacrificed so heavily, the outcome raises serious doubts.
The “mistake,” if it can be called that, lies not in the act of liberating South Africa, but in the assumption that freedom would foster gratitude, unity, and reciprocity. Instead, the post-liberation era has been marked by rising xenophobia, hostility toward African migrants, and a refusal by successive South African governments to acknowledge or honour the historical debt. As the earlier sections show, Mandela, Tambo, and Mbeki all promised to stand in solidarity with Africa once free. Yet today, South Africa treats other Africans as intruders, as competitors, and even as enemies.
This reality has led critics to argue that Africa “bred a monster.” They contend that all the resources, lives, and hope poured into South Africa were squandered, producing a nation that now looks down on its benefactors. In this sense, the liberation has felt like a betrayal—making many ask whether the sacrifice was truly worth it.
6. South Africa: Does It Deserve Recognition?
The final question then follows: Does post-apartheid South Africa deserve the recognition and respect that Africa so freely gave it?
Recognition in international relations and among communities is not a right; it is earned through conduct, character, and reciprocity. Africa recognised South Africa when it was weak, isolated, and in chains. It bestowed legitimacy upon the liberation struggle when much of the world hesitated. Today, South Africa is a regional economic power, a member of the BRICS bloc, and a leader in international forums—but its behaviour undermines its claim to continental leadership and respect.
To deserve recognition, South Africa must reconcile its present actions with its own history. It must acknowledge publicly the debt it owes to Nigeria, Ghana, Guinea, Senegal, and others. It must stop treating African citizens as second-class persons and dismantle the policies and attitudes that fuel xenophobia. As political analyst Chris Landsberg observes:
Citation: “South Africa cannot claim to be an African giant while stepping on the very hands that lifted it to its feet. True recognition will only come when it stops seeing other Africans as strangers and starts seeing them as family—just as they saw South Africans in their hour of need.”
— Chris Landsberg, South Africa and Africa: Between Hegemony and Solidarity (2014: 129)
Conclusion
The liberation of South Africa was never a mistake in principle; freedom is never a mistake. But it has become a profound disappointment in practice. The story of the struggle is one of unparalleled African unity: nations and people gave everything they had, believing they were building a stronger, more united continent. The words of Mandela, Tambo, and Mbeki stand as permanent evidence of what was promised and what was expected.
Today, the question “Was it a mistake?” serves not to condemn the struggle, but to hold South Africa accountable. Africa did its part—it opened its borders, emptied its treasuries, and gave its heart. Now it is South Africa’s turn to prove that it is worthy of that sacrifice. Until it honours its historical debt, treats fellow Africans with dignity, and lives up to the ideals for which it was freed, its recognition will remain conditional. South Africa must earn back the trust it was given freely; otherwise, history will record that its liberation was indeed a bitter lesson in misplaced loyalty.
References & Bibliography
1. Mandela, N. (1994). Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Little, Brown and Company, London.
​
2. Tambo, O. (1977). Speech delivered at the Summit of African Heads of State. Organisation of African Unity, Lagos.
​
3. Mbeki, T. (1988). Address to the People of Ghana. State House, Accra.
​
4. Adebajo, A. (2007). The Eagle and the Springbok: Nigeria, South Africa, and the Struggle for African Leadership. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Durban.
​
5. Landsberg, C. (2014). South Africa and Africa: Between Hegemony and Solidarity. Jacana Media, Johannesburg.
​
6. Meli, F. (1988). A History of the ANC: South Africa Belongs to Us. James Currey, London.
​
7. Saul, J.S. & Gelb, S. (1986). The Crisis in South Africa. Monthly Review Press, New York.
