Poems & Songs-Paul K Dolman

Poems & Songs-Paul K Dolman A poet is, before anything else, a person who is passionately in love with language. —W. H. Auden
I talk about,share and review poets and their poems.

I also link to copies of books for sale. I may get a small amount of commission if you do click and buy.

Not a poem but a remarkable story of one woman who loved poetry but also lived it. In all its forms; love, loss, pain, d...
19/12/2025

Not a poem but a remarkable story of one woman who loved poetry but also lived it. In all its forms; love, loss, pain, death and the enduring magic of a life lived to its fullest. The woman was Karen Blixen and her her life was Out of Africa. Read and marvel.

She lost her fortune, her husband, and the love of her life in Africa—then turned that devastation into one of the most beautiful books ever written.
Denmark, 1913. Karen Dinesen was 28 years old, aristocratic, brilliant, and desperately unhappy. She'd been in love with a man who wouldn't marry her—Hans Blixen, a Swedish baron and notorious womanizer. When he rejected her, she did something dramatic: she agreed to marry his twin brother instead.
Bror Blixen was charming, adventurous, and completely unreliable. But he offered something Karen wanted more than love: escape.
In January 1914, newlyweds Karen and Bror sailed for British East Africa with a plan to run a dairy farm. When they arrived in what is now Kenya, Bror changed his mind. Coffee plantation, he decided. Karen had invested her entire inheritance—her family's money—into this venture.
She had no choice but to agree.
They bought 4,500 acres at the foot of the Ngong Hills, six thousand feet above sea level, where the air was thin and clear and the view stretched to Mount Kenya. Karen called it Mbogani—"the house in the woods" in Swahili.
It should have been paradise.
Instead, it became a seventeen-year lesson in loss.
Within months of marriage, Karen discovered Bror had infected her with syphilis—a disease that would cause her chronic pain for the rest of her life. He was flagrantly unfaithful, openly taking mistresses, disappearing for weeks on safari while Karen ran the farm alone.
By 1921, they were separated. By 1925, divorced.
But Karen stayed. Because by then, she'd fallen in love—not with a man, but with Africa itself.
She learned Swahili. She walked the coffee fields at dawn, checking plants with her Kikuyu workers. She settled disputes, treated illnesses, taught children to read. The Kikuyu called her "Msabu"—a term of respect that acknowledged she was both foreign and somehow theirs.
Her coffee farm was doomed from the start. The altitude was too high—coffee wouldn't thrive there. She fought droughts, disease, pests, falling prices. She poured money into a venture that would never be profitable. But she kept trying because the farm gave her something she'd never had: purpose, autonomy, a place that was entirely hers.
And then she met Denys Finch Hatton.
He was everything Bror wasn't—educated at Eton and Oxford, a big-game hunter who quoted poetry, a man who loved the wild as much as she did but refused to be tamed by convention. He wouldn't marry her. He wouldn't live with her permanently. He came and went on his own schedule, flying his small plane across East Africa, returning to Mbogani when he chose.
It should have been maddening. Instead, it was the great love of her life.
They read poetry aloud on the veranda—Homer, Shelley, Coleridge. They flew over the Serengeti in his yellow Gypsy Moth, watching herds of wildebeest move like shadows across the plains. They talked about everything—philosophy, literature, the nature of freedom and belonging.
Denys gave Karen something no one else ever had: intellectual partnership without possession.
But freedom always has a price.
In May 1931, Denys took off in his plane for a routine flight. Hours later, word reached Mbogani: his plane had crashed shortly after takeoff. He was dead instantly, his body burned beyond recognition.
Karen buried him in the Ngong Hills, overlooking the land he'd loved. She placed a simple marker: "He prayeth well, who loveth well"—a line from Coleridge's "Rime of the Ancient Mariner."
Three weeks later, the coffee market collapsed. Karen's farm—already struggling, kept alive only by loans and determination—finally failed completely. The bank foreclosed. Seventeen years of work, gone.
She was 46 years old, bankrupt, chronically ill, and heartbroken. She'd lost everything in Africa—her fortune, her marriage, the man she loved, the land she'd given her life to.
She returned to Denmark with nothing.
Except the stories.
Back in her mother's house, sleeping in her childhood bedroom, Karen began to write. She wrote in English—not her native Danish—as if writing in a foreign tongue would let her see it more clearly. She wrote not to explain Africa but to capture it—the light, the silence, the way sunset turned the Ngong Hills purple, the dignity of the Kikuyu people who'd worked beside her.
She wrote about Denys without naming the depth of her grief. She wrote about loss without self-pity. She wrote about colonialism without either defending or condemning it—simply describing what it meant to live between worlds, belonging fully to neither.
The manuscript was rejected by American publishers. Too literary, they said. Too fragmented. No clear plot.
Then in 1937, it was published in Denmark and Britain under the title "Out of Africa," credited to Isak Dinesen—a pen name Karen had chosen years earlier.
The book became a sensation.
Critics called it poetry disguised as memoir. Readers recognized something rare: complete honesty about what it means to love a place you can never truly possess, to be changed by a land you'll have to leave.
The famous opening line became one of the most recognized in literature: "I had a farm in Africa, at the foot of the Ngong Hills."
Past tense. Already lost. The entire book is an elegy for something that ended.
Karen Blixen went on to write more books—gothic tales, philosophical stories, works that cemented her reputation as one of the 20th century's great stylists. She was nominated for the Nobel Prize multiple times. Ernest Hemingway said if he'd won the Nobel Prize in 1954, it should have gone to "that beautiful writer Isak Dinesen."
But "Out of Africa" remained her masterpiece—the book that turned personal devastation into universal art.
In 1985, Sydney Pollack directed a film adaptation starring Meryl Streep and Robert Redford. It won seven Academy Awards, including Best Picture. Millions of people discovered Karen's story, though the film romanticized what the book had left raw.
Karen Blixen died in 1962 at age 77, never having returned to Kenya. She'd spent the last three decades of her life in Denmark, but anyone who read her work knew: part of her never left Africa.
Because "Out of Africa" isn't really about Africa at all. It's about what we lose when we love things we can't keep. It's about the price of freedom and the ache of belonging. It's about how the places that break us also make us who we are.
Karen Blixen went to Africa seeking escape and found herself instead—then lost everything and wrote it into permanence.
She arrived with money and naivete. She left with nothing but memories. And those memories became one of the most beautiful books in the English language.
"I had a farm in Africa."
Five words. Past tense. Already mourning what came next.
Sometimes the stories that endure aren't the ones about triumph—they're the ones about what we loved and lost and somehow survived anyway.
Karen Blixen's farm failed. Her marriage ended. Her lover died. Her health deteriorated. Africa—the place that had given her life meaning—became a place she could only visit in memory.
But she wrote it down. Every sunset, every conversation, every moment of joy and sorrow. She preserved it in prose so vivid that readers seventy years later can still feel the wind across the Ngong Hills.
She couldn't keep Africa.
But she made sure we'd never forget it.

A poem today from the celebrated American poet and author Maya Angelou. In Still I Rise, she explores her own strengths ...
12/12/2025

A poem today from the celebrated American poet and author Maya Angelou. In Still I Rise, she explores her own strengths , traits and detertimation in the face of hatred, prejudice and oppression and in doing so it acts a clarion call for her whole race and for other such people under similar yokes that aim to keep people small, downtrodden and made to feel inferior.

Still I Rise. Maya Angelou

You may write me down in history
With your bitter, twisted lies,
You may trod me in the very dirt
But still, like dust, I'll rise.

Does my sassiness upset you?
Why are you beset with gloom?
’Cause I walk like I've got oil wells
Pumping in my living room.

Just like moons and like suns,
With the certainty of tides,
Just like hopes springing high,
Still I'll rise.

Did you want to see me broken?
Bowed head and lowered eyes?
Shoulders falling down like teardrops,
Weakened by my soulful cries?

Does my haughtiness offend you?
Don't you take it awful hard
’Cause I laugh like I've got gold mines
Diggin’ in my own backyard.

You may shoot me with your words,
You may cut me with your eyes,
You may kill me with your hatefulness,
But still, like air, I’ll rise.

Does my sexiness upset you?
Does it come as a surprise
That I dance like I've got diamonds
At the meeting of my thighs?

Out of the huts of history’s shame
I rise
Up from a past that’s rooted in pain
I rise
I'm a black ocean, leaping and wide,
Welling and swelling I bear in the tide.

Leaving behind nights of terror and fear
I rise
Into a daybreak that’s wondrously clear
I rise
Bringing the gifts that my ancestors gave,
I am the dream and the hope of the slave.
I rise
I rise
I rise.

Buy her poems here:

And Still I Rise: Maya Angelou

06/12/2025

Another new offering. Perhaps less of a poem and more of a cautionary tale for the young.

Working at 40
©️Paul k Dolman Dec 2025

Stumbling through the dark,
crashing into the door of reality,
he stands over the toilet, pi**es and stares at the full, window framed moon.
Maddeningly it whispers to him, in no uncertain way;
‘return to the warm blankets of your dreams’.

Anointing himself with hot needles he soaps away the scum of lethargy.
With the hope of a razor, he shaves away stubble and despair, knowing both will return the next day. Unlike the snake shedding its old skin renewing Itself, he timidly sloughs away with a yielding, undetermined towel,.

Unthinkingly he condemns himself each day, checking his appearance . His mirror, judge and jurry, sentences with a brutality that takes his breath away.

Coffee machine dispensing liquid like wisdom, sometimes misses the cup and seeps away. He’s tempted to think gathering spilt black coffee back into its cup is a possibility. It can only be wiped away, perhaps leaving a faint stain.
Like many mornings , he drinks from an almost empty cup.

He talks to children and kisses lips that don’t return the favour. His “see you later” more question than statement, hangs in the air, only falling on deaf ears with the closing front door.

He is not alone wondering who is more crumpled; his suit is not always the clear winner; his tie askew, seemingly hanging him like the corporate noose it is. Each scuff of shoes earned by feet, barely lifted above curbs he faces

In shop windows, catching his reflection , he wants to retrace his steps 20 years, then, his vision less wrinkled, his world unshrinked, his step more certain.

As rain falls from grey skies, stopping for a moment he watches individual drops converge into a mass; gathering pace in gutters, eventually disappearing down drains, washed away forever. Contemplating only a moment more, he continues. And continues . And continues, to go to work at 40.

A very apposite poem for our times, John Donne, an English poet born in 1572 and died 1631, wrote one of the most famous...
18/11/2025

A very apposite poem for our times, John Donne, an English poet born in 1572 and died 1631, wrote one of the most famous poems of all time. In a world where nations, races and creeds are divided and creating great barriers, walls and frontiers Donne reminds us of the unifying nature of simply being human. And that just ones man death can, if are sensitive enough to it, diminishes all of us, in some small or greater way.

No Man Is An Island” by John Donne
No man is an island,

Entire of itself,

Every man is a piece of the continent,

A part of the main.

If a clod be washed away by the sea,

Europe is the less.

As well as if a promontory were.

As well as if a manor of thy friend’s

Or of thine own were:

Any man’s death diminishes me,

Because I am involved in mankind,

And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;

It tolls for thee.

Buy John Donne’s collected works here:

John Donne: Collected Poetry (Penguin Classics)

A fascinating essay about ‘truth’ and fiction. And how we should question at times, accepted truth, what history tells u...
16/11/2025

A fascinating essay about ‘truth’ and fiction. And how we should question at times, accepted truth, what history tells us, what we are being told now. Even Social media posts like this one?!! :)

In 1951, a female mystery writer used a detective novel to challenge 500 years of historical 'fact'—and convinced millions that one of history's greatest villains was innocent.

Josephine Tey had a problem with authority—especially the authority of accepted historical narratives written by men who'd never questioned their sources.

Born Elizabeth Mackintosh in 1896 in Inverness, Scotland, she chose to write under pseudonyms her entire career. First as Gordon Daviot for her plays, then as Josephine Tey for her detective novels. The reasons were complex—privacy, the freedom to write across genres, perhaps the knowledge that women writers weren't always taken as seriously.

By 1951, Tey had established herself as one of Britain's finest mystery writers. But she was bored with the formula. Country house murders. Bumbling police. Clever detectives finding fingerprints and questioning suspects. She wanted to write something different.
Something that would challenge not just a fictional murderer, but history itself.

The Daughter of Time opens with Inspector Alan Grant laid up in a hospital bed, bored out of his mind. A friend brings him pictures of historical figures to occupy his time. Grant, a detective trained to read faces and assess guilt, becomes fascinated by a portrait of Richard III.

The man in the portrait doesn't look like a murderer. He doesn't look like the twisted, evil villain from Shakespeare's famous play. He looks thoughtful, even kind.

This bothers Grant. Because Richard III is "known" to have murdered his young nephews—the Princes in the Tower—to secure his throne. It's one of history's most infamous crimes, taught in schools, immortalized in literature, accepted as fact.

But what if it wasn't fact? What if it was propaganda?

Through Tey's detective, she began systematically dismantling the case against Richard III. Grant sends researchers to libraries. He reads contemporary accounts. He examines the timeline. He asks basic investigative questions that historians apparently never bothered with: Who benefited from the princes' deaths? Who had motive? Who actually had opportunity?
The answers were startling.

Richard III had little motive to kill his nephews—he'd already been crowned king, and the boys had been declared illegitimate. Killing them would only create martyrs and potential rallying points for rebellion.

But Henry VII, who defeated Richard at Bosworth Field and founded the Tudor dynasty? He had enormous motive. The princes were threats to his shaky claim to the throne. Henry married their sister to legitimize his rule—but that meant the princes, if alive, had a better claim than he did.

Henry VII also had opportunity. He controlled the Tower after Richard's death. He controlled who could investigate. He controlled the historical narrative.

And most tellingly, Henry VII never actually accused Richard of the murders during Richard's lifetime. The accusations came later, after Richard was dead and couldn't defend himself, when the Tudors needed to justify their seizure of the throne.

Tey's detective realizes what historians should have recognized centuries ago: the case against Richard III was built almost entirely on Tudor propaganda, written by people whose power depended on Richard being a villain.

Shakespeare's famous portrayal of Richard as a hunchbacked monster? Based on Tudor sources written to please Elizabeth I, Henry VII's granddaughter.

The historical "consensus" about Richard's guilt? Based on uncritical acceptance of obviously biased sources.

History hadn't been written by objective observers. It had been written by the winners, and the winners needed Richard to be a monster to justify their own seizure of power.

What Tey did was revolutionary. She took the methods of detective fiction—careful examination of evidence, questioning of witnesses' motives, skepticism toward convenient narratives—and applied them to accepted historical fact.

And she did it in a novel that became a bestseller.

The British historical establishment was not amused. Here was a woman, a fiction writer, questioning centuries of scholarship. Male historians who'd built careers on Tudor history dismissed her arguments. They said she was a novelist, not a historian, that she didn't understand the complexity of medieval politics.

But readers loved it. The book sparked massive public interest in Richard III. People began reading the actual historical sources instead of accepting what they'd been taught. Amateur historians formed societies to investigate Richard's reputation. The case for Richard's innocence gained serious academic support.

Josephine Tey had done something extraordinary: she'd used popular fiction to challenge academic authority, and she'd won the public debate.

The Daughter of Time is regularly cited as one of the greatest mystery novels ever written—not because of its plot twists, but because its central mystery is real. The Crime Writers' Association voted it the greatest mystery novel of all time in 1990.

But Tey's achievement goes deeper than solving a historical cold case. She demonstrated something profound about how we construct and accept "truth."

She showed how narratives become calcified into fact through repetition. How bias becomes invisible when it's held by those in power. How propaganda, given enough time, becomes history.

How rarely we question what we're taught simply because everyone seems to agree.

In 1951, a woman writing under a pseudonym used a bedridden detective to challenge 500 years of historical consensus—and millions of readers found her argument more convincing than the work of professional historians.

The ripple effects continue today. In 2012, Richard III's skeleton was discovered under a parking lot in Leicester. DNA testing confirmed his identity. The skeleton showed scoliosis (a curved spine), but nothing like the grotesque deformity described by Tudor propaganda. The battlefield wounds suggested he died fighting bravely, not fleeing cowardly.

Physical evidence was vindicating what Tey had argued in 1951: Richard had been maligned by people who needed him to be a villain.

When Richard III was reburied in 2015 with full honors, many credited Josephine Tey with beginning the rehabilitation of his reputation. A fiction writer's novel had literally changed how a nation viewed one of its kings.

Tragically, Tey died of cancer in 1952, just a year after publishing The Daughter of Time. She was only 55. She never saw the full impact of her work, never witnessed the decades of scholarship that would support her arguments, never knew that Richard III's bones would be found and would confirm her skepticism of Tudor propaganda.

She wrote eight detective novels in total—a small output, but each one sharp, psychological, unconventional. She questioned authority in all of them, challenged comfortable assumptions, pushed boundaries.

But The Daughter of Time remains her masterpiece, not just as fiction, but as intellectual rebellion.

She proved that you don't need a PhD to question academic consensus. That fiction can be a vehicle for truth. That asking "who benefits from this story?" is always a valid question. That history deserves the same skeptical examination we give to crime scenes.
Josephine Tey—a Scottish woman writing under a pseudonym, outside the academic establishment, using the "lowbrow" genre of detective fiction—took on 500 years of historical certainty.
And she won.

She didn't do it with credentials or institutional authority. She did it with logic, evidence, and the courage to say: "This story doesn't add up. Someone has lied to us. Let's find out why."

Male historians dismissed her.
The reading public believed her.

And sixty years later, when they dug up Richard III's bones, the evidence suggested the mystery writer had been right and the historians had been wrong.
Sometimes the most important mysteries aren't about who committed the crime.
They're about who's been lying about it ever since.
Josephine Tey asked that question in 1951.
We're still learning from the answer.

Another poem from the great WB Yeats.  A somewhat political poem that foresees the death of an Irish pilot in the first ...
25/10/2025

Another poem from the great WB Yeats. A somewhat political poem that foresees the death of an Irish pilot in the first World War, fighting on behalf a country the Irish are trying to gain independence, against a percieved common enemy. Hence the lines… “Those I fight I do not hate, those that I guard I do not love “

An Irish airman foresees his death
WB Yeats 1865-1939

I know that I shall meet my fate
Somewhere among the clouds above;
Those that I fight I do not hate
Those that I guard I do not love;

My country is Kiltartan Cross,
My countrymen Kiltartan’s poor,
No likely end could bring them loss
Or leave them happier than before.

Nor law, nor duty bade me fight,
Nor public men, nor cheering crowds,
A lonely impulse of delight
Drove to this tumult in the clouds;

I balanced all, brought all to mind,
The years to come seemed waste of breath,
A waste of breath the years behind
In balance with this life, this death.

Buy here:

Collected Poems: W.B. Yeats: 13 (Macmillan Collector's Library, 13)

Brian Patten recently died. Brian is a particular favourite poet of mine. Born in Liverpool in 1946, he along with Roger...
05/10/2025

Brian Patten recently died. Brian is a particular favourite poet of mine. Born in Liverpool in 1946, he along with Roger Mcgough and Adrian Henri were the foundation of the Liverpool beat poets movement of the early 1960’s. He had a long distinguished career, and though his work was varied it was his love poetry that particularly moved me. His is infused with a wistful melancholy that seems to tap into an ache, whoever small, we all have; whether we know it or not. For example feel it as you read;

Song for Last Year's Wife by Brian Patten

Alice, this is my first winter
of waking without you, of knowing
that you, dressed in familiar clothes
are elsewhere, perhaps not even
conscious of our anniversary. Have
you noticed? The earth's still as hard,
the same empty gardens exist; it is
as if nothing special had changed,
I wake with another mouth feeding
from me, yet still feel as if
Love had not the right
to walk out of me. A year now. So
what? you say. I send out my spies
to discover what you are doing. They smile,
return, tell me your body's as firm,
you are as alive, as warm and inviting
as when they knew you first... Perhaps it is
the winter, its isolation from other seasons,
that sends me your ghost to witness
when I wake. Somebody came here today, asked
how you were keeping, what
you were doing. I imagine you,
waking in another city, touched
by this same hour. So ordinary
a thing as loss comes now and touches me.

You can buy his collection of Love poetry here:

Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. For a full refund with no deduction for return shipping, you can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition.

21/08/2025

Another new poem. This time about the death of a loved one. A poem inspired by too many growing instances. But it arrives suffused with some ultimate hope or enlightenment.

I Am Dead to You ©️ Paul Dolman

I am dead to you.
The spaces I once filled now echo with absence.
My scent, my silent loyalties—
they linger in the air like the ghost I’ve become.
And as the world rushes past,
you'll wonder if I was ever really there.
But the whispering breeze will carry my voice,
and my hands?
They’ll be the sun, warm and soft,
brushing your skin in passing.

I am dead to you.
My endearments unheard,
my thoughts unreadable now,
sealed in silence.
Will I become the longing
you no longer dare to long for?
Will my absence soothe
the troubled waters of your mind?
And yet—
one day, my old jacket may catch you off guard,
its worn fabric rekindling my scent.
And my eyes?
Reflections in your mirror,
searching and desiring
the return of your smile.

03/08/2025

New poem of my own. Every so often I write a new poem. Let me know your thoughts, good or bad. Thank you.

Salt in my tears ©️Paul Dolman 2025

Do you recall we talked loud and wild?
Now you just whisper to me through the years
And you were the one cold in my warm arms
Before you became the salt in my tears

Did we change each other for the better?
You wrote me a poem like none before
I wrote you a song of tragic regret.
Now they are papers in my bottom drawer

Where did that summer and lovers go?
I’m in the autumn of sweet despair
footprints on our own private beaches
Washed away like an unheard prayer.

We had our secrets and exquisite pain
You kept yours in boxes, mine on my sleeve
Did we add to them through our wasted years?
More practice in the art of how to grieve?

The space we have left has no room for regret
And perhaps we were not the prizes to be won
But wandering in and out of others lives
always changes winter gloom to summer sun

Lovers and friends we know will come and go
And what we gain or give is never clear
But the closeness of bodies and kindnesses
Takes away the sting of salt in my tears

Another great American poet is Robert Frost. Born in 1874 and dying in 1963, he won the Pulitzer price for poetry. He wa...
12/07/2025

Another great American poet is Robert Frost. Born in 1874 and dying in 1963, he won the Pulitzer price for poetry. He was exemplary in his ability to depict rural life using American colloquialism that reflected the complexity of human relationships and existence. One such poem is the Road Not Taken , that ponders and examines the profundity of choice.

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

Buy his collected poems here:

The Collected Poems

Poems can be simple and direct. They do not have to be ornate or full of metaphors. And if you want to write poetry then...
08/07/2025

Poems can be simple and direct. They do not have to be ornate or full of metaphors. And if you want to write poetry then starting and developing your craft in a very simple and direct form is a good way to start.
Here is an example by William Carlos Williams.An American, born in 1883 and passing 1963, Williams was a physician as well as a poet and won a posthumous Pulitzer Prize for poetry. This is one of his most famous poems illustrating simple form in style and subject, offering an apology for a mundane act of domestic defiance.


Let me know what you think in the comments below.

This Is Just To Say

I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox

and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast

Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold

©️William Carlos Williams

But his collected works here:

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.

24/06/2025

Time for one by of my own poems. A recent one about a recent topic. And some of you may smell a whiff of irony when you read it. Let me know what you think!

Cancel culture- ©️Paul Dolman 2925

Don't cancel them
For not being famous
An influencer or celeb
Too few hits on Google
No pics on the World Wide Web

Don’t cancel them
For a diminutive social media following
Or for not having a podcast to stream
For lacking in that drive and entrepreneurial skill
And not falling for every get rich scheme

Don't cancel them
For constantly being un-newsworthy
Not even a chance of a centre spread
Or a single obituary column
That they've now passed and the life they once lead

It seems the ones being cancelled
Are the ones with the least to say
The invisible ones ignored
who quietly go their own way

And those we laud and put on a pedestal
Shout the loudest on Instagram and Twitter
Berating millions as to their lack of voice
Irony lost, words full of twist and bitter

Though I don't know the answer in a world
Where success is mainly defined by money and fame
I would prefer to be one who's cancelled
And not be a player in this particular game

Address

Birmingham

Telephone

+447961846952

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Poems & Songs-Paul K Dolman posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Establishment

Send a message to Poems & Songs-Paul K Dolman:

Share

Category