Skeptical Seán

14/10/2026

Bro never misses, but this is paleontologcially accurate! 😄😄😄👍👍

13/10/2026

I am shadow banned. 😄

12/10/2026

If there remains an honest Young Earth Creationists out there, I wonder how they respond to this: wooden structures dated to 7,000 years ago, not by radiometric dating, but by the rings in the wood itself.

The age of these trees is literally written upon them, as long as have the tree ring pattern data to read it. Fortunately, Tegel et al did the hard work of collecting that data for us.

So we have obvious and intuitive evidence of a wooden structure that predates not only when the world is supposed to have been Created, but also the Noachian flood. This is a wooden structure that supposedly survived a Global flood that was violent enough to change landscapes.

It really doesn't add up. Wells and dams should be the first thing destroyed in a flood, and nothing should exist 7,000 years ago if your theology says the world is younger than that.

So how do you apologize for that?

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figures?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051374

27/09/2026

25/09/2026

Yes.

24/09/2026

It always comes down to this: I present evidence that I feel demonstrates my evidence of evolution, and Creationists comes up with 100 different reasons why my evidence isn't sufficient for them.

I then ask what their evidence is of Creation by an intelligent designer, and then immediately change the topic to either things neither of us have evidence to support, or questions cannot personally answer.

They don't actually present evidence for Creation by intelligent design, aside from the instance that anything too complex to be explained by natural processes was made by the deity whose avatar was a Middle Eastern Rabbi. But this doesn't logically follow.

There's also the assertion that every observation is a support of Creationism. This is a child's approach to argument. "Everything you said just supports me."

Is there any direct observation evidence of Creation by intelligent design, like there is for all the things photographed below?

Are there experiments that demonstrate the process by which Creation by Intelligent Design occurs?

Are there modern populations of organisms demonstrating Creation by Intelligent Design?

Are there fossils that show organisms predicted by the assumption of a creator?

Is there any positive demonstrable evidence of Creation by Intelligent Design? Or does the whole claim rely on denying all other ideas about how the world works, without ever providing evidence of its own?

21/09/2026

This might be the end for Skeptical Sean.

The strikes on my account make growth unlikely, and I am getting bored engaging with the dumbest arguments on the interwebs for no reason other than my own enjoyment.

But for the 2 fans I have that aren't bots, I will continue to post when the spirit moves me. However I'm not going to be trying to post regularly anymore.

The work v reward just isn't there.

19/09/2026

Facebook allowed my comments about Charlie Kirk to be my most popular comment for WEEKS. Then, a page with ANTIFA in the name published it, and suddenly I am facing 10 strikes for sharing a post supporting terrorism.

Meanwhile, when I try to report the actual death threats I got in response to the post, I get an error message.

We see you Zuckerberg.

For anyone who is confused, the order of messed up goes like this:

1) Wishing well on friends and enemies alike
2) Not feeling bad when an enemy dies
3) Making a joke/ insensitive comment when an enemy dies
4) Making a joke/ insensitive comment when an stranger person dies
5) making a comment about wanting an enemy to die
6) making a comment about wanting a stranger person to die
7) actively calling for violence against an enemy
8) actively calling for violence against a stranger
9) Threatening to do violence against an enemy
10) Threatening to do violence against a stranger

Jesus said to only do #1, I was guilty of #3. Charlie was guilty of #4. Facebook's rules ban #6 and higher.

However, against me they allowed #6 and #10

11/09/2026

It is only when people place their humanity second to a larger ideal that they can do something this awful. No one who lives fully in this world could do something like this. No one who thinks life is over and that's it, would sacrifice themselves to do this much damage to another.

Whether it's nationalism, Christianity, Buddhism, Shintoism, or Islam, putting ideas over human lives never ends well.

It is only by adopting the mentality that we all wish to live and thrive, and we should do so hurting as few as possible, that we can avoid making fanatics that do things like this. Once we start drawing up tribal allegiances, or start putting our God's will above the well being of other humans, that is when acts of grandiose violence can suddenly be justified.

Live in this world. Worship kindness. Do good in this life.

What good is never forgetting, if you don't remember the lesson?

10/09/2026

In honor of Charlie Kirk's death, I am considering some gun deaths acceptable. Like his. I consider it acceptable.