01/09/2026
🇦🇺 Hanson Renews Push for Nuclear Power as Energy Debate Heats Up
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson is calling for two new nuclear reactors on Australia’s east coast, while arguing that coal-fired power stations should continue operating as part of the country’s future energy mix.
During One Nation’s Victorian election campaign, Hanson said Australia should not rely on a single source of electricity and backed a combination of nuclear, coal and gas.
⚡ Key points from Hanson’s proposal:
🔹 Two nuclear reactors on the east coast
🔹 Continued support for coal-fired power stations, including Loy Yang
🔹 More investment in coal and gas
🔹 Opposition to expanding renewable energy projects
Hanson has also separated One Nation’s proposal from the Coalition’s former nuclear plan under Peter Dutton, which proposed seven taxpayer-funded reactors but failed to gain enough public support at the 2025 federal election.
One Nation has previously estimated that $6.8 billion could fund one nuclear reactor, based partly on projected costs from South Korea. Energy experts have questioned whether similar construction costs could be achieved in Australia.
Tony Wood of the Grattan Institute has warned that nuclear energy would require substantial government backing, strict regulation and many years to build, while international projects have demonstrated how expensive nuclear construction can become.
The issue is emerging as one of Australia’s major energy debates, with political parties divided over the future balance between coal, gas, nuclear and renewable energy.
The debate has also intensified politically following One Nation’s breakthrough Secret Harbour by-election victory, with Hanson and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese trading increasingly sharp criticism.
🔥 Your view: Should Australia invest in nuclear power while keeping coal plants operating, or should the country focus primarily on renewable energy?