24/08/2026
THERE’S NO SIGN OF INTELLIGENT LIFE ANYWHERE: It’s week 6. Situationships splintered. Groupchats in disrepair. The Law R***e Instagram posted a reel about it a few days ago. Tensions are rising in tutorials throughout Gardens Point this morning, as group assignments heat up across every faculty.
Despite the fact that working in the legal profession is almost always some form of undesirable teamwork, it seems the School of Law is not immune. The 20-40% weighted style of assessment remains one of our degree’s most feared experiences, second only to missing out on tickets to high-society events like Law R***e or Law Dinner.
Eager to find out why this is the case, we turned to one of HiQ’s leading scientists, Dr. Jim John.
“New tests are finding that every student is hysterically convinced they’re the only competent member of any group they’ve ever been in.” he explained.
“Therein lies the statistical anomaly - where is the LLBludger? Somebody must be the group member everyone complains about, but we are yet to come across them. We are officially dubbing this perplexing phenomenon the Group Assignment Paradox.”
When told he’d used the word “paradox” incorrectly, John threatened our journalist with an academic sanction and a shadow ban on their Bot Bar privileges.
It was only last semester that we first received confirmation that the deadly affliction reared it’s head in our degree. Patient zero, Anita Hand had become the first to report back pain from having to carry their group, describing the assessment as “the most one-sided cl*******ck I’ve ever experienced.”
Read more at thegeorgestreetjournal.com