https://www.facebook.com/daksmarinero/

MarinerongDaks, Baras, Canaman (2026)

24/06/2025

Behind every successful man, there is a woman. Behind every unsuccessful man, there are two women. Stay loyal mga kaDaks 😉 🇧🇷

23/02/2025

Father seeks answers to seafarer son missing onboard car carrier

February 4, 2025
Maritime News
By Liz Lagniton

For Elias Bobiles Jr., 62, every day since December 5, 2024 has been a painful waiting game. His 28-year-old seafarer son, Ralph Anthony Bobiles, a deck cadet on the Panama-flagged vessel Prestige Ace, vanished without a trace while the ship was en-route to Baltimore, U.S. from Mexico, transporting high-end cars.

Two months later, Elias, also a village captain in San Roque, Tabaco City, continues to seek answers. Ralph’s agency, Parola Maritime Agency, has yet to provide a concrete investigation report, and authorities in Panama and the United States have not released any findings.

Frustrated and heartbroken, Elias is now fighting for justice, determined to uncover the truth behind his youngest son’s disappearance.

Worst nightmare
In an interview with Maritime Fairtrade, Elias recalled the last conversation he had with Ralph, just a day before his disappearance.

“On December 4, my son called me via video and said, ‘Papa, I’ll be in the Philippines before Christmas because my contract is ending. And I have good news — I’ve been promoted from cadet to ordinary seaman,’” Elias recounted in Filipino.

But the anticipated homecoming never happened. Instead, on the morning of December 6, Elias received a call from Ralph’s wife, crying and barely able to speak. When he rushed to their home, he learned that Ralph was missing. His son’s agency had delivered the news, but crucial details were absent.

“What’s really disheartening is that the agency seems to be guessing everything. They don’t care about my son’s life; what matters to them is their company’s income,” Elias said, his disappointment evident in his voice during the interview.

Unanswered questions
Elias quickly realized there were inconsistencies surrounding his son’s disappearance.

“They gave me the crew list when I asked for it. The first list, from Veracruz port in Mexico, had 22 names. But when I requested the lists from the four ports where the ship docked — Baltimore, Brunswick (Georgia), Jacksonville, and Veracruz — it was down to 21. That means my son was no longer on it,” he said.

“The final list only had 21 crew members. So, it means the captain didn’t immediately report the missing crew member,” Elias stressed.

He said that maritime agency executives explained why no missing person report was made. “The vice president of Parola told me that the captain didn’t report a missing crew member because it would delay the delivery of luxury cars to the four ports,” he said in disbelief. “To them, business is more important than human life.”

“I was so disappointed by their view that business takes priority over seafarers. Without seafarers, they wouldn’t have income. They should be valuing these cases more,” Elias said.

His frustration grew when, during a December 23 Zoom meeting with agency representatives, the topic of insurance was already raised.

“I told them, ‘Why are we talking about insurance? That means you’ve already concluded something. I wanted a real investigation.’”

The grieving father stressed that his family’s main priority is justice, not financial compensation.

He also shared he got a letter from the agency’s president on December 13 saying an investigation would be conducted when the ship reached Baltimore. But no such investigation ever took place, he said.

According to Elias, the agency never reported the missing crew member to the U.S. Coast Guard. “To this day, there’s still no proper report for my family,” he said.

“That is why it pains us. I raised my son well, with the fear of God, gave him a good education, and he now has a family of his own. Now, all his dreams have been shattered,” Elias added.

The 28-year-old Filipino seafarer, Ralph Anthony Bobiles, has been missing since December 5, 2024, while his ship was sailing through the Gulf of Mexico.

Suspicious behavior from crew members
A report from the Mexican government, not the maritime agency, eventually provided Elias with some details. The statement said that on December 5, the crew held a toolbox meeting at 6.45 am to assign tasks for the day.

Elias recounted that his son worked alongside ordinary seaman Michael Layao as they began their duties aboard the 200-meter car carrier transporting luxury vehicles. Around 10 am, Ralph and Michael took a 15-minute snack break. During this break, Michael saw Ralph heading toward his cabin.

“One of them, Michael, claimed that during their 10.00 am break on December 5, he saw my son go to his cabin. If that’s the case, then he must have followed my son because the cabin was far from the workplace where he was assigned. How could he give that statement if he wasn’t following my son?” Elias asked.

According to Michael’s statement, at 10.20 am, he knocked on Ralph’s cabin, but no one answered. “He just assumed my son had returned to work,” Elias said.

But the timeline makes no sense to Elias. “These men all have radios. Why didn’t they call my son? At 12.00 pm during lunch break, no one noticed he was missing? Then at 1.00 pm, when work resumed, why didn’t they check?”

Even more troubling, Elias noticed the crew’s silence. “My son’s three best friends, (including Michael) — two seamen and the bosun — unfriended my daughter-in-law on social media. Why would they do that if they had nothing to hide?” he asked.

A possible cover-up?
Elias is convinced that foul play or negligence was involved, as the ship’s officers failed to report his son’s disappearance until 5.05 pm, nearly seven hours after Ralph was last seen.

“It’s possible. Of the 21 crew members left, only one was foreign (a Korean), and the rest were Filipinos. All of them are persons of interest, potential witnesses,” he said.

“My son went missing at 10.20 am, and they only reported him missing at 5.05 pm. That’s almost seven hours! By then, the ship had traveled so far. The Gulf of Mexico is rough (at night). How could they have rescued him then?”

Elias believes this critical delay could have made a difference in finding Ralph.

“And now, the (shipowner) won’t even allow me to go to America to retrieve my son’s belongings. I’ve tried four times, and they keep refusing. I asked the maritime agency’s lawyer, ‘What are you hiding? Why don’t you want me to go?’” he asked.

According to Overseas Workers Welfare Administration’s chief, Arnel Ignacio, the Mexican government conducted a search and rescue operation, but it was called off after 72 hours with no results.

Ralph’s relationships with the crew
When asked if Ralph had enemies among his crewmates, Elias found it hard to believe he did.

“You don’t get promoted if you have bad relationships with other crew members. Before you get promoted, the captain would ask all the crew, ‘How is Cadet Bobiles doing?’ If my son had problems with others, he wouldn’t have been promoted. He always told me, ‘Papa, everything’s okay. I have no problems with them.’”

Elias also emphasized that there was no indication his son would have committed su***de. “I’m sure there was foul play involved.”

A family in pain
While Elias fights for justice, Ralph’s wife and three young children aged two, seven, and eight are struggling to cope.

“The first two weeks were the worst for my daughter-in-law. She didn’t want to eat or talk. My grandkids also keep asking me, ‘Papa, where’s Daddy?’ I tell them he’ll be home soon,” Elias said.

In January, Elias appealed to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. for assistance in finding his missing son. He also called on concerned government agencies and offices to help expedite the investigation.

“My son is more than just a seafarer, he’s the heartbeat of our family, a devoted son, brother, husband and father of three precious children waiting for their dad to bring home presents last Christmas,” he said in his earlier post on social media.

A senate inquiry
Meanwhile, Senator Raffy Tulfo, who recently interviewed Elias on his TV program when the latter approached him for help, has ordered a thorough investigation into Ralph’s case.

The senator promised to immediately launch a senate investigation to summon the officials of the agency, the shipowner, and the Maritime Industry Authority. The investigation will examine the incident and review standard procedures for addressing the increasing cases of missing Filipino seafarers.

“The captain of the Prestige Ace will also be summoned once he’s back in the Philippines, and they’ll invite all the crew members,” Elias revealed.

Tulfo also recommended that the Department of Migrant Workers temporarily suspend Ralph’s agency’s license until the investigation is completed.

“I’m confident someone will speak up,” Elias said, hoping the questions surrounding his son’s disappearance will finally be answered.

His only wish now is to see a real investigation and to finally be allowed to go to America to retrieve his son’s belongings.

“I just want justice for my son,” the grieving father concluded.
--

©️ Ralph Bobiles/Elias Bobiles

23/02/2025

REAL ACCIDENT: A Very Large Ore Carrier (VLOC), carrying a full load of iron ore fines, was sailing under combined wind and swell conditions with waves reaching approximately 3.7 meters on the starboard side. Originally constructed as a Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC), the vessel had undergone modifications after sixteen years of service as a tanker, transforming it into an ore carrier.

Despite the conversion, the ship retained its original dimensions—311.89 meters in length, 58.00 meters in beam, and 29.50 meters in depth. However, structural modifications to the cargo hold hatches and an adjustment to the load line resulted in an increase in both gross tonnage and deadweight tonnage. Since its conversion, the vessel had been in operation as a VLOC for eight years.

At approximately 13:20 local time, the ship’s superintendent onshore received an urgent message via social media from the vessel, stating: "Emergency. No. 2 Port side is leaking. The ship is rapidly tilting to port." The superintendent attempted to establish communication via satellite phone, but no response followed. Moments later, the vessel transmitted a distress signal through INMARSAT-C Digital Selective Calling. By the following day, only two crew members were found alive in a liferaft. The remaining 22 crew members were never located.

One of the survivors later recounted that he had heard a sudden, loud impact and felt the ship’s hull vibrate. Acting swiftly, he retrieved his lifejacket and immersion suit before heading to the port-side muster station near the accommodation area—only to find it empty. Shortly after, the Master’s announcement instructed all crew to proceed to the bridge. He ascended to the bridge using the external ladders and found the Master along with several other crew members. By this time, the ship was already listing significantly to port. As the vessel keeled further, water encroached upon the bridge, prompting him to jump into the sea from the port bridge wing. Within five minutes of the initial impact, the ship had completely submerged.

An investigation into the incident concluded that, at the time of the accident, the ship's loading conditions met the stability criteria required by maritime conventions. Even if ballast tanks 2 and 3 (port side) had sustained damage, such damage alone would not have explained the rapid sinking of the vessel.

Furthermore, the ship had been transporting iron ore fines—a cargo known to be prone to liquefaction—but analysis confirmed that the moisture content remained within the safe transportable moisture limit (TML) at the time of loading. There was no recorded rainfall during the loading process, and no excessive bilge water was detected in the cargo holds while the vessel was in transit, making liquefaction an unlikely cause of the disaster.

Key Takeaways
While cargo liquefaction has been a well-documented cause of bulk carrier losses in the past, this particular incident appears to have stemmed from a different issue.

Over 24 years of service, the vessel had likely been subjected to repeated asymmetric loading patterns, leading to excessive stress on the lower shell plating. Over time, this stress contributed to both structural and fatigue-related weakening of the hull. The catastrophic failure of the ship’s structure ultimately caused it to sink within minutes.

The idea of a vessel being lost due to structural deterioration may seem improbable, given the stringent inspection protocols in place. However, this case serves as a stark reminder that such failures remain possible—even decades after the sinking of the Erika off the coast of France. Investigations into the Erika incident revealed that while visible sections of the hull showed relatively minimal aging, the vessel’s structural elements, which were more challenging to inspect regularly, had significantly deteriorated. The parallels between these cases highlight the critical importance of continuous and thorough structural assessments to prevent similar tragedies.