07/01/2026
🖼📸 Reflections in a nutshell: photography. For Dummies
By Vanessa Rusci 📸🖼
The algorithm is a powerful tool.
And like all powerful tools, if it is not understood, it can cause serious damage. Even in art.
Lately, I see wool threads appearing everywhere on photographs.
In itself, there is nothing wrong with experimenting. On the contrary. Every visual language is born through the exploration of what others have already done, if it is approached with study, respect, and a genuine desire to find one’s own voice.
The problem arises when the gesture is no longer research, but imitation.
When it is not an expressive necessity, but a shortcut.
When something is done because it “works,” because it “gets likes,” because “the algorithm rewards it.”
Anyone with even a minimally trained eye can immediately sense this.
Not out of malice. Simply because depth, even when still immature, can be felt. Just as its absence can be felt.
And the greatest risk is this: remaining trapped in small, self-referential gardens, nourished only by likes, without real growth, without genuine dialogue, without a trajectory capable of lasting over time.
Photography, when it truly becomes art, is a long journey.
Age does not matter. One can start even at sixty.
What matters is the approach. What matters is seriousness. What matters is culture, which is not an elitist luxury, but an act of responsibility toward oneself and toward the medium being used.
Studying does not impoverish you.
Studying sets you free.
And it makes the journey infinitely more engaging, stimulating, and meaningful for photography itself.
It will take time, yes. A lot of time.
But there are no alternatives that truly take you far.
A personal note, stated clearly and with respect:
please do not send me works that lack a serious project, or without a real commitment to undertaking a deep path in photography and art.
You may have started yesterday, but then what is required is humility and listening, not cleverness. Shortcuts lead nowhere.
One last thing.
As much as influencers may be criticized, one thing should be acknowledged: they work hard. They study the algorithm, they commit to what they do, they are consistent.
The problem is not visibility. The problem is confusing visibility with knowledge.
We are all, in different ways, victims of an illusion created by the algorithm: the illusion of believing we know.
True freedom begins when we accept that we still do not know enough.
For those who truly wish to explore the relationship between photography and manual intervention (thread, stitching, embroidery), here are some historical and contemporary references. After 2020, there are many more online. Do not search only on Google or Instagram and Facebook.
Use multiple search engines, multiple platforms, and above all, take the time to research who you are looking at.
Not to imitate, but to understand where we come from before deciding where to go.
Annegret Soltau
LĂĽneburg, Germany, 1946
Feminist photography movement
https://www.itintandem.com/it/art/self-1975-1976-annegret-soltau
Maurizio Anzeri
Loano, Italy, 1969
https://www.maurizioanzeri.com
Melissa Zexter
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
https://www.melissazexter.com
Joana Choumali
Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, 1974
https://www.joanachoumali.com
Han Cao
China
https://www.hanwriting.com
Julie Cockburn
London, United Kingdom, 1966
http://www.juliecockburn.com
Gemma Carly Pepper
London, United Kingdom
https://www.instagram.com/gempepper
Soltau and Warhol are fundamental to the historical genealogy.
Anzeri, Cockburn, Zexter, Choumali, and Han Cao define the post-2000 canon of the gesture where thread becomes a suture of the image.