10/09/2026
Because the "marriage penalty" is so brutal, thousands of disabled Australians are forced into what is essentially system-enforced celibacy or perpetual dating.
People deliberately choose to live apart, never marry, or tragically break up just to keep their medical survival money.
The government isn't actually "saving" money by keeping the rule; they are just preventing human happiness and forcing people to live in separate houses, which ironically puts more strain on the broader housing and rental markets.
Governments seem to think if you are a couple then your costs are reduced.
But the costs of a disability is not reduced.
It remains the same cost, day in and day out.
The means testing is not just cruel, it is unnecessary.
Disabled people lose the basic right of a traditional relationship out of fear the sky will fall and it would cost too much.
But no one cares.
They think and believe in fairy tales where a girl meets a boy.
She accepts his disability, she likes him for who he is.
She wants to be with him, wants to marry.
Well before they marry the decide to move in together.
Now she is his sole financial responsibility.
This leads to bitterness.
She starts seeing him as a burden.
The love she had turns to hate, she starts to abuse him emotionally, financially.
He ends up depressed, leaves and now is emotionally scarred, back on support payments and homeless.
This is the not a fabrication.
This is happening every single day in Australia.
Our Government knows this is happening.
You now know it is happening.
But you will not fight for it, because you worry of the cost.
What's more important the financial cost or the human cost. ( which is not real, it costs the same, there is no change, because disabled people do not marry or live together to protect their payments and to not have this happen to them again)
I guess some of us realize one matters more than the other.
Meanwhile we are making more tax breaks for billionaires and corporations, after all, we are coming up to elections, who else is going to fund those campaigns?