04/09/2026
“It’s not in the budget.”
Okay.
Then maybe it shouldn’t be in the production.
Because this phrase gets used in touring like the budget is some natural force that descended from the sky.
It isn’t.
A budget is a series of decisions.
And if a production keeps getting bigger, more complicated, more technically ambitious and more demanding, while staffing, prep time, travel, rates and recovery somehow remain the flexible part of the equation, eventually somebody has to absorb that difference.
Usually it’s the crew.
More work. Same people.
More complexity. Same prep.
More changes. Less notice.
Less recovery.
And then when people start struggling under it, we say:
“That’s touring.”
Sometimes it is.
Sometimes things go wrong. Weather happens. Trucks break. Flights cancel. Shows change.
But sometimes it’s just poor planning.
And touring crews are so good at solving problems that they can actually hide poor planning.
They stay late.
They improvise.
They fix it.
They make the show happen.
So the show goes up, everyone calls it a success, and the people making the decisions never experience the actual cost of those decisions.
Someone else absorbed it.
That’s how dysfunction becomes normal.
Of course productions have financial limits.
That’s exactly the point.
Scope has to match resources.
If the only way you can afford the production you designed is by continuously asking the people executing it to absorb the difference in their time, workload, sleep and quality of life…
you can’t actually afford that production.
So when somebody says:
“It’s not in the budget.”
Maybe the real question is:
Then why is it in the show?